Throughput that was never achievable
Capacity demonstrated on a clean test profile, never under the real order structure, seasonality and SKU mix. The shortfall is structural.
Home Consulting Technical due diligence
Consulting · Technical due diligenceFor investors and companies acquiring a business or an automated facility. I assess equipment, software and operations and show you the technical risks and the future investment needs before you decide.
Commercial and financial DD tell you what the target earned. They don't tell you whether the automation behind those earnings will still hit its numbers in year three. Nor what happens when volume runs 30 % above plan.
Capacity demonstrated on a clean test profile, never under the real order structure, seasonality and SKU mix. The shortfall is structural.
Per-site branches, undocumented interfaces, licence exposure and very few people who understand the material-flow logic.
Often the most profitable line in the target and the least examined. Supplier contract terms decide whether that margin survives the transaction.
A risk register with cost and probability, ordered by what matters for the decision.
A CAPEX and OPEX view across the intended hold period, including what the current plan has deferred.
The questions for management sessions, the clauses worth putting into the SPA and a view on price impact.
ASRS, shuttles, conveying, AMR and AGV fleets, robotics, sorters. Condition, remaining life, spare-parts exposure and realistic sustained throughput against the target's own order profile.
WMS, WCS and MFC architecture down to the PLC and SCADA layer. Product or project, release discipline, interface debt, licensing and documentation.
Availability and what drives it, maintenance maturity, staffing and shift model, change-request backlog and whether the KPIs in the data room match peak operation.
Supplier contracts, acceptance status, open claims and penalties, service agreements and what the CAPEX plan has committed or deferred.
Findings for each lens, a quantified risk register and prioritised recommendations.
Where needed: software assessment, DevOps and licensing review, software valuation, business-model verification and post-merger integration.
The effort follows the decision it supports. A red flag review stops after the site visit and compresses the rest into a short written opinion.
Layouts, throughput specifications, acceptance protocols, availability records and supplier contracts, with a targeted document request.
Week 1The system running under a real order profile, ideally in a peak shift. Interviews with operations, maintenance, IT and the supplier.
Week 1–2Sustained throughput modelled against the target's own SKU mix. Software architecture, interface debt and licences assessed. Spare parts and obsolescence reviewed.
Week 2–4Findings for each lens, a quantified risk register and a CAPEX and OPEX view across the hold period.
Week 4–5Debrief with the deal team, questions for management sessions, SPA clauses and a view on price impact.
Before signingWhere needed: software assessment, licensing review, software valuation and post-merger integration.
As scopedMuch of my experience comes from the supplier side. That is why the question of bias deserves a direct answer.
No agency agreements, reseller arrangements, referral fees or commissions from any equipment supplier or software vendor. My income doesn't depend on which system you end up with.
I don't design, supply or install the equipment I assess. There's no implementation contract waiting behind the report.
Fixed fee per phase or a daily rate, agreed before the work starts. No success fee tied to whether a deal completes.
If I have worked with the target, the supplier or the incumbent integrator, you hear it before you appoint me. The same applies where a party is a customer of LogIQ VDA5050.
Customers are anonymised.
Technology: Autonomous mobile robots including fleet controller software.
I can walk through a live situation under NDA or run a short red-flag review on something already in the data room.