Sized for the average, not the peak
A layout sized against a clean average rather than the real order structure and seasonality hits a wall in the first busy week. The shortfall is structural.
Home Consulting Planning and tendering
Consulting · Planning and tenderingFor companies planning a new automated warehouse or a major extension. I plan from your data up and write a functional tender that suppliers answer on your terms. The aim: sound decisions on processes, technology and suppliers.
Throughput, footprint and lifetime cost are largely decided in the concept and the tender. Once the layout is fixed and the contract signed, a weak assumption is paid for every year of the asset's life.
A layout sized against a clean average rather than the real order structure and seasonality hits a wall in the first busy week. The shortfall is structural.
When the specification comes from the supplier, proposals are only comparable with each other and the quiet assumptions favour the seller.
Concept, simulation and business case often come from the party that profits from a yes. Someone who has commissioned these systems can tell you which figures will hold on the floor.
Order structure, SKU profile, seasonality and growth drive the design, not an average.
Every supplier answers the same functional requirement. Proposals are evaluated against criteria you agreed beforehand.
Sized for the peak and checked by someone who has taken these systems through commissioning.
Order structure, SKU profile and seasonality from real data. Current process mapped, bottlenecks quantified, growth and peak scenarios defined.
Technology options weighed against your own profile, sized for the peak, with the trade-offs stated.
Facility planning and layout, building included where needed. Static throughput calculation and, through my network, dynamic simulation where the risk warrants it.
Tender documents written around your requirement. Supplier-specific documents where a shortlist is already set.
Structured evaluation against defined criteria, CAPEX and OPEX compared like for like, technical questions settled before signing.
The awarded scope handed cleanly to project management, with the open technical points documented.
Scoped to the decision in front of you: a concept study, a tender or the full path from analysis to award. I work as your independent planner. Simulation and specialist tasks go to experts from my network, agreed with you beforehand.
Order and item data, growth assumptions and constraints turned into a quantified brief.
Step 1Technology options weighed against your profile, sized for the peak.
Step 2Layout developed and, where the risk warrants it, confirmed by dynamic simulation.
Step 3Functional tender issued, proposals evaluated, technical points negotiated, award handed to delivery.
Step 4Customers are anonymised.
Technology: Automated shuttle storage, delayering robots, case stacking robots, WCS, pack-pattern generator.
Technology: Building, automated high-bay warehouse, shuttle system, pallet conveyor, multi-zone picking, AGVs, WCS.
The earlier the review, the more room there is to change the answer. The first conversation costs nothing.